Also Facebook (was: Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion)
Ricky Beam
jfbeam at gmail.com
Fri Jul 10 04:53:21 UTC 2015
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 21:48:06 -0400, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> Both techniques indicate more than 20% of the US Internet users are
> connecting via IPv6.
Interesting method that's full of holes (and they know it), but it's data
nonetheless.
Globally, it's still ~4.5%. Within my own pool of providers, I'm ZERO for
5. (I've not pinged TWC-BC lately, 'tho. And no one has gotten back to me
that Earthlink has provided TWC with any prefixes, so us Earthlink cable
internet customers are still dark.)
> (They’ve also observing a significant performance
> improvement with IPv6 connected users over IPv4 connected...
IPv4 tends to be NAT'd and aggressively proxied. I also wouldn't rule out
v6 taking a different path, but that wouldn't explain the magnitude of
difference those slides would suggest. (not really readable via youtube)
More information about the NANOG
mailing list