gmail spam help

Suresh Ramasubramanian ops.lists at gmail.com
Fri Feb 13 01:04:25 UTC 2015


Please. Gmail isn't ever likely to use long dead hobbyist block lists.
On Feb 12, 2015 9:38 PM, "Daniel Taylor" <dtaylor at vocalabs.com> wrote:

> Possibly related: http://www.ahbl.org/content/changes-ahbl
>
> We had to manually remove it from spamassassin for our local installation,
> and I am pretty sure that a lot of sites still haven't figured it out so
> there's a lot of false positives being generated all over the place to
> throw off even filters that don't use it directly.
>
> On 02/12/2015 09:54 AM, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
>
>> Mainly because I own it, and the people who use it. The server has been
>> around 10+ years and has tight oversight. SPF is proper. This is a recent
>> issue.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Scott Helms [mailto:khelms at zcorum.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 10:51 AM
>> To: Alex Rubenstein
>> Cc: Josh Luthman; NANOG list
>> Subject: Re: gmail spam help
>>
>> I'd be interested to know how you can be so adamant about the lack of
>> spam from this specific server.  A great percentage of the spam hitting
>> servers I have visibility into comes from very similar kinds of set ups
>> because they tend to have little or no over sight in place.
>>
>> Also, lots of commercial email gets flagged as spam by users, even when
>> they opted in for the email.  If enough people flagged email from this
>> server as spam it will cause Google to consider other email from the same
>> small server as likely to be spam as well.  Small systems, especially new
>> ones, tend to unintentionally look like spam sources by not having proper
>> reverse records, making sure you have SPF set up for the domain, etc.
>>
>>
>> Scott Helms
>> Vice President of Technology
>> ZCorum
>> (678) 507-5000
>> --------------------------------
>> http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
>> --------------------------------
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Alex Rubenstein <alex at corp.nac.net
>> <mailto:alex at corp.nac.net>> wrote:
>> I should have been clearer.
>>
>> I have been getting complaints from my sales folks that when they send
>> emails to people who use gmail (either a gmail account or google apps) that
>> they recipient is reporting that the email is ending up in the Spam folder.
>> So, I tested this myself, sending an email from alex at corp.nac.net<mailto:
>> alex at corp.nac.net><mailto:alex at corp.nac.net<mailto:alex at corp.nac.net>>
>> to rubenstein45 at gmail.com<mailto:rubenstein45 at gmail.com><mailto:
>> rubenstein45 at gmail.com<mailto:rubenstein45 at gmail.com>>
>>
>> [cid:image001.png at 01D046AD.3B2FA890]
>>
>> This is curious to me, since @corp.nac.net<http://corp.nac.net> is a
>> small exchange implementation with only about 50 users behind it, and there
>> is no question that there is no spamming going on from here.
>>
>> So, it’s not a question of adding a filter or not using gmail; it is not
>> me who is using gmail in this problem.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Josh Luthman [mailto:josh at imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:
>> josh at imaginenetworksllc.com>]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 9:32 AM
>> To: Alex Rubenstein
>> Cc: NANOG list
>> Subject: Re: gmail spam help
>>
>>
>> Create a filter.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340<tel:937-552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:937-552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> On Feb 12, 2015 8:11 AM, "Alex Rubenstein" <alex at corp.nac.net<mailto:alex
>> @corp.nac.net><mailto:alex at corp.nac.net<mailto:alex at corp.nac.net>>>
>> wrote:
>> Is there anyone on-list that can help me with a world -> gmail email
>> issue, where email is being considering spam by gmail erroneously?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel Taylor          VP Operations            Vocal Laboratories, Inc.
> dtaylor at vocalabs.com   http://www.vocalabs.com/            (612)235-5711
>
>



More information about the NANOG mailing list