Nat

Mark Andrews marka at isc.org
Wed Dec 16 23:52:41 UTC 2015


This doesn't put pain on those that have enough addresses that they don't need
to NAT yet.  We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only.

Mark

On 17/12/2015, at 10:39 AM, Charles Monson <charles.lists at camonson.com> wrote:

> We need to make IPv4 painful to use.  Adding  delay between SYN and SYN/ACK would
> be one way to achieve this.  Start at 100ms..200ms and increase it by 100ms each year.
> 
> It seems like NAT would be another way to make IPv4 more painful to use.




More information about the NANOG mailing list