Nat

Ahmed Munaf ahmed.dalaali at hrins.net
Wed Dec 16 16:36:19 UTC 2015


In addition to the limited concurrent sessions for ASR1000, we are facing some issue with many users how are playing online games! Nat problems! 

Ahmed, 

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 7:22 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 16/Dec/15 12:45, Ahmed Munaf wrote:
> 
>> Yes, we are using ASR1004 for NAT, we are considering A10 or Citrix or F5. we’ve not decided till now! 
>> maybe we change it  to another product, if anyone give us a better solution. 
>> 
>> this will be used for ISP’s users. 
> 
> The ASR1000 is not a bad large scale NAT device. Are there any specific
> issues you are facing with it?
> 
> Mark.




More information about the NANOG mailing list