Nat
Ahmed Munaf
ahmed.dalaali at hrins.net
Wed Dec 16 16:36:19 UTC 2015
In addition to the limited concurrent sessions for ASR1000, we are facing some issue with many users how are playing online games! Nat problems!
Ahmed,
> On Dec 16, 2015, at 7:22 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 16/Dec/15 12:45, Ahmed Munaf wrote:
>
>> Yes, we are using ASR1004 for NAT, we are considering A10 or Citrix or F5. we’ve not decided till now!
>> maybe we change it to another product, if anyone give us a better solution.
>>
>> this will be used for ISP’s users.
>
> The ASR1000 is not a bad large scale NAT device. Are there any specific
> issues you are facing with it?
>
> Mark.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list