Low-numbered ASes being hijacked? [Re: BGP Update Report]

Sun Nov 30 19:26:11 UTC 2014

On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:53:07 +0900, "Paul S." said:
> Do these people never check what exactly they end up originating
> outbound due to a config change, if that's really the case?

You're new here, aren't you? :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20141130/c1da3557/attachment.sig>