Cheap LSN/CGN/NAT444 Solution

Mon Jun 30 13:05:58 UTC 2014

On Jun 30, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Simon Perreault <simon at per.reau.lt> wrote:

> Why? Cause that (per-subscriber limits on ports and memory) is exactly what we recommend in RFC 6888...

<https://app.box.com/s/a3oqqlgwe15j8svojvzl>

I can't tell you how many times I've received frantic 4AM calls about NATted wireless networks going down due to this sort of thing.  It's a real problem.

Also, there are horizontal behaviors which are undesirable, as well.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

                   Equo ne credite, Teucri.

    		   	  -- Laocoön