Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion)

Fri Jun 20 14:50:51 UTC 2014

There are obviously layer 8-9-10 issues to deal with as well before native 
IPv6 can be deployed.

Being a IP NOC grunt, I keep my focus on layer 1-7.

JF

Jean-François Dubé
Technicien, Opérations Réseau IP
Ingénierie Exploitation des Réseaux
Vidéotron

"NANOG" <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> a écrit sur 2014-06-20 10:22:17 :

> De : Gabriel Blanchard <gabe at teksavvy.ca>
> A : "nanog at nanog.org" <nanog at nanog.org>, 
> Date : 2014-06-20 10:24
> Objet : RE: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion)
> Envoyé par : "NANOG" <nanog-bounces at nanog.org>
> 
> 6rd is in my opinion a band-aid solution, I don't see the point of 
> offering IPv6 if it requires IPv4. native IPv6 should be offered 
> where possible.
> 
> We offer native IPv6 to all our DSL customers but only on an opt-in 
> basis, we're although unfortunately unable to offer IPv6 over Cable 
> since we still depend on a certain incumbent...
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jean-
> Francois.Dube at videotron.com
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 10:13 AM
> To: lists at sadiqs.com
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org; NANOG
> Subject: RE: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion)
> 
> Videotron (AS5769) is offering 6RD (RFC5969) to all residential 
> customers, if their gear supports it. (DHCP option 212)
> 
> (But our MGMT still calls it beta for now.)
> 
> JF
> 
> Jean-François Dubé
> Technicien, Opérations Réseau IP
> Ingénierie Exploitation des Réseaux
> Vidéotron
> 
> "NANOG" <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> a écrit sur 2014-06-18 20:16:01 :
> 
> > De : Sadiq Saif <lists at sadiqs.com>
> > A : nanog at nanog.org,
> > Date : 2014-06-19 12:43
> > Objet : Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion) Envoyé 
> > par : "NANOG" <nanog-bounces at nanog.org>
> > 
> > On 6/18/2014 14:25, Lee Howard wrote:
> > > Canada is way behind, just 0.4% deployment.
> > 
> > Any Canadian ISP folk in here want to shine a light on this dearth of 
> > residential IPv6 connectivity?
> > 
> > Is there any progress being made on this front?
> > 
> > --
> > Sadiq Saif