Can anyone check this routing against Charter in WI?

Michael Clark mikeal.clark at gmail.com
Mon Jun 16 00:20:54 UTC 2014


Well my routing isn't nearly that bad.  I haven't been able to get confirmation but support said they are probably just routing around a problem and they can't get any direct feedback form network engineers. 

I should get an update tomorrow hopefully.  I'm also seeing some bandwidth issues on charters internal network.  Something must be going on.

Best to have up and go get some Bells :)

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 15, 2014, at 7:10 PM, Rusty Dekema <rdekema at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Are you still seeing odd routing with Charter in Wisconsin? Charter's routing in Michigan seems to be going pretty crazy at the moment as well. 
> 
> The following traceroute is from a Charter residential line* in Kalamazoo MI to a Comcast business (DOCSIS) line in Ypsilanti MI, by way of several unknown hops, some of which are in RFC 1918 space, Sprintlink possibly in Fort Worth TX, another unknown hop, then Comcast Dallas TX, Comcast Marietta GA, Comcast Ashburn VA, then finally Comcast MI. Needless to say, this is not the normal route:
> 
>     http://pastebin.com/9CKmea6M
> 
> Tracing the same route but in the other direction also yields odd results. The route proceeds normally to a Comcast ibone router in 350 E. Cermak (Chicago IL), but the very next hop after that router is the public IP of the Charter service in Kalamazoo MI as follows:
> 
>     http://pastebin.com/VCCgnUsn
> 
> For what it's worth, if anyone could explain to me what might cause that behavior (between hops 8 and 9), I would really appreciate the knowledge.
> 
> The routing between that same Charter residential service and a Merit/Michnet endpoint in southeast Michigan is also odd, taking a detour through Virginia [xe-8-3-0.1018.asbn0.tr-cps.internet2.edu (198.71.47.25)], which it does not normally do. The routing in that case does appear to be the same regardless of which side you initiate the traceroute from.
> 
> Cheers,
> Rusty Dekema
> 
> 
> * The Charter residential line's IP address is currently reverse resolving to a Charter DHCP pool in Bay City, MI, which is over 100 miles from Kalamazoo. This is also unusual. The Charter service in question is now and has always been located in Kalamazoo MI.     
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Mikeal Clark <mikeal.clark at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hoping someone auditing the list can provide some insight or a back
>> channel support option.
>> 
>> I started having some good latency spikes last night, which have
>> continued this morning, so I finally took a look at things and I am
>> seeing a lot more routing than I expected.  Support is telling me this
>> is normal but I don't remember this many replies on traceroute.  My
>> speeds are about 1/5 the normal as well this morning and seeing some
>> dropped packets even using a test sight inside Charter's network.
>> This is just business cable so my support options are pretty limited.
>> 
>> 4    10 ms    14 ms    13 ms
>> dtr01shbywi-tge-0-3-0-23.shby.wi.charter.com [96.34.24.178]
>>   5    18 ms    11 ms    17 ms  dtr01wbndwi-bue-2.wbnd.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.30.17]
>>   6    12 ms    11 ms    11 ms  dtr02wbndwi-bue-1.wbnd.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.24.56]
>>   7    17 ms    11 ms    11 ms  dtr02fdulwi-bue-3.fdul.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.30.19]
>>   8    13 ms    18 ms    18 ms  dtr01fdulwi-bue-1.fdul.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.19.144]
>>   9    19 ms    14 ms    15 ms  crr03fdulwi-bue-2.fdul.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.20.8]
>>  10    30 ms    22 ms    35 ms  crr02euclwi-bue-6.eucl.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.22.240]
>>  11    23 ms    22 ms    43 ms  bbr02euclwi-bue-4.eucl.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.2.6]
>>  12    22 ms    34 ms    19 ms  bbr01euclwi-bue-5.eucl.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.0.6]
>>  13    34 ms    30 ms    38 ms
>> bbr01stcdmn-tge-0-0-0-3.stcd.mn.charter.com [96.34.0.115]
>>  14    42 ms    43 ms    52 ms  65.46.47.77
>>  15    78 ms    78 ms    92 ms  ae1d0.mcr2.minneapolis-mn.us.xo.net
>> [216.156.1.86]
>>  16    93 ms    82 ms    82 ms  vb1711.rar3.denver-co.us.xo.net [216.156.0.173]
>>  17    81 ms    95 ms    82 ms  te-3-0-0.rar3.sanjose-ca.us.xo.net
>> [207.88.12.58]
>>  18    83 ms    82 ms    98 ms  207.88.14.226.ptr.us.xo.net [207.88.14.226]
>>  19    81 ms    78 ms    78 ms  216.156.84.6.ptr.us.xo.net [216.156.84.6]
>>  20    77 ms    78 ms    88 ms
>> xe-2-2-0-955.jnrt-edge02.prod1.netflix.com [69.53.225.30]
>>  21    86 ms    78 ms    78 ms  te1-8.csrt-agg02.prod1.netflix.com
>> [69.53.225.10]
>>  22    79 ms    78 ms    82 ms  www.trynetflix.com [69.53.236.17]
>> 
>>   4    12 ms    11 ms     8 ms
>> dtr01shbywi-tge-0-3-0-23.shby.wi.charter.com [96.34.24.178]
>>   5    17 ms    10 ms    12 ms  dtr01wbndwi-bue-2.wbnd.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.30.17]
>>   6    11 ms     9 ms    15 ms  dtr02wbndwi-bue-1.wbnd.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.24.56]
>>   7    15 ms    18 ms    18 ms  dtr02fdulwi-bue-3.fdul.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.30.19]
>>   8    16 ms    14 ms    11 ms  dtr01fdulwi-bue-1.fdul.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.19.144]
>>   9    20 ms    14 ms    15 ms  crr03fdulwi-bue-2.fdul.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.20.8]
>>  10    22 ms    22 ms    18 ms  crr02euclwi-bue-6.eucl.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.22.240]
>>  11    18 ms    22 ms    22 ms  bbr02euclwi-bue-4.eucl.wi.charter.com
>> [96.34.2.6]
>>  12    35 ms    30 ms    31 ms  bbr01chcgil-bue-1.chcg.il.charter.com
>> [96.34.0.9]
>>  13    27 ms    27 ms    27 ms  prr01chcgil-bue-2.chcg.il.charter.com
>> [96.34.3.9]
>>  14    27 ms    27 ms    27 ms
>> 96-34-152-30.static.unas.mo.charter.com [96.34.152.30]
>>  15    29 ms    32 ms    27 ms  209.85.244.1
>>  16    27 ms    27 ms    28 ms  209.85.254.238
>>  17    54 ms    40 ms    40 ms  209.85.248.214
>>  18    38 ms    40 ms    38 ms  216.239.43.217
>>  19     *        *        *     Request timed out.
>>  20    44 ms    40 ms    40 ms  google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]
> 



More information about the NANOG mailing list