best practice for advertising peering fabric routes

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Wed Jan 15 18:22:20 UTC 2014


On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Niels Bakker <niels=nanog at bakker.net> wrote:
> * nanog at shankland.org (Jim Shankland) [Wed 15 Jan 2014, 18:04 CET]:
>
>> So ... RFC1918 addresses for the IXP fabric, then?
>>
>> (Half kidding, but still ....)
>
>
> They need to be globally unique.

do they? :)

also... there is/was an exchange in south america (columbia maybe?
it's been a while since I saw this in configs) that used
192.168.0.0/16 space for their exchange.




More information about the NANOG mailing list