So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

Thu Aug 14 07:22:45 UTC 2014

Subject: Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Date: Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:27:46AM -0700 Quoting Merike Kaeo (merike at doubleshotsecurity.com):

> > B: they *did* know about the issue, but convincing management to spend
> > the cash to buy hardware that doesn't suck was hard, because
> > "everything is working fine at the moment" -- some folk needed things
> > to fail spectacularity to be able to justify shelling out the $$$ (
> > yes, they could recard the TCAM, but they are using this as an excuse
> > to get some real gear)…
> 
> Oh yeah, I'd bet this is also the case.  Just like in 'security' related issues….

This is why "test crash" was introduced. 

	http://markmail.org/message/tu46ecy272o3stvp

/Måns, just rebooted. (with a new carving already configured) 
-- 
Måns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
Thousands of days of civilians ... have produced a ... feeling for the
aesthetic modules --
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140814/2762a0fe/attachment.sig>