Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls
Simon Perreault
simon at per.reau.lt
Tue Apr 22 12:01:28 UTC 2014
Le 2014-04-19 06:23, Florian Weimer a écrit :
>>> I agree with Bill. You can poopoo NAT all you want, but it's a fact
>>> of most networks and will continue to remain so until you can make a
>>> compelling case to move away from it.
>>
>> Does that mean all IPv6 firewalls should support NAT?
>
> In the sense that they "MUST be able to provide email filtering
> features": yes.
That requirement should be removed.
>> Remember, we're aiming for a base set of requirements applying to
>> all IPv6 firewalls.
>
> The document has more than just base requirements.
The document is flawed as-is.
Simon
More information about the NANOG
mailing list