Radware vs Arbor

Fri Sep 27 13:08:22 UTC 2013

A10 is in pretty early stages right now on DDoS , this may be a good thing if you have time to wait and can help mold them a bit. They are still mostly enterprise focused , not really carrier grade . Radware is a little further along, but Arbor is king when it comes suitability for a carrier deployment. 

________________________________

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:05:36 +0200
From: Fabien Delmotte <fdelmotte1 at mac.com>
To: Tempest <tempestterror at gmail.com>
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: Radware vs Arbor
Message-ID: <6DE5C148-F65B-4894-A13E-80E13A93AFA3 at mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hi,

Maybe you can see what A10 Networks is doing. They build a new product dedicated to DDOS.

Regards

Fabien

Le 26 sept. 2013 ? 18:47, Tempest <tempestterror at gmail.com> a ?crit :

> Doing a bunch of research, and I can't find a meaningful comparison of
> these two products.  Work for a carrier, and I am looking at implementing a
> DDoS mitigation service that we can sell to our customers.  Radware is
> cheaper, but I am seeing a lot of noise in various forums that makes me
> question their viability for what we need.  Arbor has most of the market,
> and I assume there is good reason for it.  Both companies seem to be very
> deceptive about how they compare to the other.  Anyone out there with good
> hands on experience that can compare?  Not interested in input from either
> company, we get plenty of that already.  Good experience, or links to good
> write ups would be excellent...
> 
> Davis B.

End of NANOG Digest, Vol 68, Issue 80
*************************************