NOOP and Terremark

Mon Oct 28 15:01:01 UTC 2013

I'm sorry, I should have phrased differently.

I meant: By the number of responses I've received that have been told to me
"in private," or with a "this is not public info,"...

While I certainly would not violate those restraints I do agree with you.

jamie

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins at arbor.net> wrote:

>
> On Oct 28, 2013, at 5:27 PM, jamie rishaw <j at arpa.com> wrote:
>
> >  It's clear that we all still consider open discussions on things like
> this to be something to be kept to a small vetted community.
>
> It's not clear to me at all.
>
> Real-time discussions of specific events in order to coordinate response,
> sure - it's important to limit those communications to the
> groups/individuals who can do something useful to help in real time.
>
> General discussion of attack characteristics, defensive tactics, etc.,
> absolutely not - they must be shouted from the rooftops.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
>
>           Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
>
>                        -- John Milton
>
>
>

-- 
jamie rishaw // .com.arpa at j <- reverse it. ish.

*"Reality defeats prejudice."* - *Rep. Barney Frank*