BCP38 needs advertising

Wed Mar 27 22:19:57 UTC 2013

    Noted.

    But today's contribution by Eric M. Caroll might end up on the front
page =D.

    I got the domains...  Now I just need a few free hours to setup
something useful.

    As always, don't be shy to drop me contribution offlist.   

-----
Alain Hebert                                ahebert at pubnix.net   
PubNIX Inc.        
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443

On 03/27/13 14:31, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> But of course. :-)
>
> Also, just saw this:
>
> http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-ddos-that-almost-broke-the-internet
>
> - ferg
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Arturo Servin <arturo.servin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>         And do not forget ....
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp38
>>
>> :)
>>
>> -as
>>
>>
>> On 3/27/13 2:17 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>>> Please reference:
>>>
>>> http://openresolverproject.org/
>>> http://spoofer.csail.mit.edu/
>>> http://blog.cloudflare.com/deep-inside-a-dns-amplification-ddos-attack
>>>
>>> ...and anything else to raise the awareness level.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> - ferg (co-perpetrator of BCP38)  :-)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Alain Hebert <ahebert at pubnix.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>     bcp38.org coming soon =D
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> Alain Hebert                                ahebert at pubnix.net
>>>> PubNIX Inc.
>>>> 50 boul. St-Charles
>>>> P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
>>>> Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443
>>>>
>>>> On 03/27/13 11:20, Jack Bates wrote:
>>>>> Outside of needing more details and examples, BCP38 could use more
>>>>> advertising.
>>>>>
>>>>> The best option, if they would accept it, is to have all RIRs mention
>>>>> BCP38 as well as require that mention of BCP38 be included in all IP
>>>>> justification requests to customers (so that those who receive
>>>>> netblocks from their ISPs are also aware of it).
>>>>>
>>>>> For ARIN, at least, having it mentioned in the attestation process
>>>>> wouldn't be a bad idea. At least someone of management would be aware
>>>>> of it.
>>>>>
>>>>> The only issue is see concerning the RIRs is that they may object to
>>>>> it being out of scope to their duties. However, informing people of
>>>>> something is not requiring implementation of something. On the other
>>>>> hand, we know that there are a great number of networks that don't
>>>>> participate with the community at large and may have no idea about
>>>>> BCP38 and why it is important.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jack
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>