Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

Derek Ivey derek at derekivey.com
Thu Mar 7 03:08:48 UTC 2013


That looks like your problem right there. Have you tried connecting via 
ethernet instead and seeing how Youtube performs?

On 3/6/2013 10:09 PM, Min wrote:
> yes, i'm use wireless at home.
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Derek Ivey <derek at derekivey.com> wrote:
>> Why are your response times so high at your first hop? Are you maxing out
>> your connection or connected to your router over wireless?
>>
>> Derek
>>
>> On 3/6/2013 9:58 PM, Min wrote:
>>> I use FIOS.  Here is my result:
>>>
>>>    Host                                Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst
>>> StDev
>>>    1. Wireless_Broadband_Router.home    0.0%   165  285.1 563.9  68.2 2007.
>>> 376.1
>>>    2. L100.WASHDC-VFTTP-127.verizon-gn  0.0%   165  299.8 560.3  59.1 2021.
>>> 384.4
>>>    3. G0-9-4-1.WASHDC-LCR-22.verizon-g  0.6%   165  241.3 698.7  64.6 24918
>>> 1938.
>>>    4. so-14-0-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-  0.0%   165  217.2 705.7 100.6 24817
>>> 1926.
>>>    5. 0.xe-4-1-0.XL4.IAD8.ALTER.NET     0.0%   165  308.0 714.6 109.8 24717
>>> 1920.
>>>    6. TenGigE0-7-2-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NE  0.0%   165  265.3 722.6 103.5 24617
>>> 1911.
>>>       TenGigE0-7-0-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
>>>       TenGigE0-5-0-1.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
>>>       TenGigE0-7-1-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
>>>       TenGigE0-7-4-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
>>>       TenGigE0-5-0-0.GW7.IAD8.ALTER.NET
>>>    7. google-gw.customer.alter.net     59.4%   165  281.3 982.9 162.3 24516
>>> 2940.
>>>    8. 216.239.46.248                    0.6%   164  247.3 726.7 112.2 24416
>>> 1903.
>>>    9. 72.14.238.173                     0.0%   164  203.1 729.7  85.9 24315
>>> 1895.
>>> 10. iad23s05-in-f6.1e100.net          0.6%   164  343.2 712.9  35.1 24215
>>> 1890.
>>>
>>> In my case, I suspected two things.
>>>
>>>     1. congestion (verizon over subscribed)
>>>     2. packet out of order (high packet drops in alternet-google could be
>>> a symptom of multipath)
>>>
>>> Not sure which has bigger performance impact to youtube.
>>>
>>> Min
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Grant Ridder <shortdudey123 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> The 1st one gets slow at XO and the 2nd and 3rd get slow at Sprint.
>>>>
>>>> Now the interesting one with XO is that it is routed in a /30 that is
>>>> assigned to Google by XO.
>>>>
>>>> network:Class-Name:network
>>>> network:ID:NET-XO-NET-d1302a54
>>>> network:Auth-Area:209.48.0.0/15
>>>> network:Network-Name:XO-NET-d1302a54
>>>> network:Organization;I:GOOGLE INC. (328874-1)
>>>> network:IP-Network:209.48.42.84/30
>>>> network:Admin-Contact;I:XCIA-ARIN
>>>> network:Tech-Contact;I:XCIA-ARIN
>>>> network:Created:20120917
>>>> network:Updated:20121018
>>>> network:Updated-By:ipadmin at eng.xo.com
>>>>
>>>> -Grant
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Min <qiu.min98 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 3 traces all indicated the last hub are 80~100ms faster than the
>>>>> second last hub.  Interesting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Min
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Derek Ivey <derek at derekivey.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I just got home and tested with quite a few 1080p videos. No issues
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> my
>>>>>> Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel. I did notice frequent stops to buffer
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> my
>>>>>> FiOS IPv4 connection. I have a 50 Mbps down connection and don't even
>>>>>> come
>>>>>> close to maxing it when watching Youtube videos.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here are a few traceroutes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [2.1-BETA0][root at pfsense]/root(1): traceroute
>>>>>> r19---sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com
>>>>>> traceroute to r19.sn-p5qlsm7d.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.184), 64 hops
>>>>>> max,
>>>>>> 40 byte packets
>>>>>>    1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.222 ms 1.348
>>>>>> ms
>>>>>> 0.834 ms
>>>>>>    2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.839
>>>>>> ms
>>>>>> 2.589 ms  2.443 ms
>>>>>>    3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.880 ms
>>>>>> 14.614
>>>>>> ms  14.698 ms
>>>>>>    4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.647 ms
>>>>>> 14.696 ms  14.552 ms
>>>>>>    5  0.xe-3-1-1.BR1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.37.141)  15.027 ms 15.004 ms
>>>>>> 15.064 ms
>>>>>>    6  te9-2-0d0.cir1.ashburn-va.us.xo.net (206.111.0.201)  38.517 ms
>>>>>> 36.033
>>>>>> ms  34.816 ms
>>>>>>    7  216.156.8.189.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.8.189)  31.958 ms  30.994 ms
>>>>>> 29.194 ms
>>>>>>    8  209.48.42.86 (209.48.42.86)  124.931 ms  126.117 ms  124.303 ms
>>>>>>    9  208.117.251.184 (208.117.251.184)  26.483 ms  27.792 ms 27.974 ms
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [2.1-BETA0][root at pfsense]/root(2): traceroute
>>>>>> r15---sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com
>>>>>> traceroute to r15.sn-p5qlsm76.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.148), 64 hops
>>>>>> max,
>>>>>> 40 byte packets
>>>>>>    1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.077 ms 0.863
>>>>>> ms
>>>>>> 0.968 ms
>>>>>>    2  G10-0-8-112.HRBGPA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.184.148) 2.429
>>>>>> ms
>>>>>> 2.265 ms  2.456 ms
>>>>>>    3  P12-0-0.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.185)  14.788 ms
>>>>>> 14.666
>>>>>> ms  14.643 ms
>>>>>>    4  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.591 ms
>>>>>> 14.479 ms  16.041 ms
>>>>>>    5  0.xe-10-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.165)  15.007 ms 15.109
>>>>>> ms
>>>>>> 14.975 ms
>>>>>>    6  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  187.038 ms  115.363 ms  117.669 ms
>>>>>>    7  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.263 ms
>>>>>>       sl-st31-ash-0-8-0-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.1.19)  116.491 ms
>>>>>>       sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  116.934 ms
>>>>>>    8  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  122.521 ms
>>>>>> 122.780
>>>>>> ms  121.535 ms
>>>>>>    9  208.117.251.148 (208.117.251.148)  33.669 ms  37.652 ms 38.478 ms
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [2.1-BETA0][root at pfsense]/root(6): traceroute
>>>>>> r10---sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com
>>>>>> traceroute to r10.sn-p5qlsm7l.c.youtube.com (208.117.251.47), 64 hops
>>>>>> max,
>>>>>> 40 byte packets
>>>>>>    1  L100.HRBGPA-VFTTP-12.verizon-gni.net (98.117.0.1)  1.159 ms 0.831
>>>>>> ms
>>>>>> 0.806 ms
>>>>>>    2  G9-0-4-212.HRBGPA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.139.126) 2.396 ms
>>>>>> 2.435 ms  2.167 ms
>>>>>>    3  so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (130.81.28.254) 14.497 ms
>>>>>> 14.767 ms  14.695 ms
>>>>>>    4  0.xe-11-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.169)  15.001 ms 15.074
>>>>>> ms
>>>>>> 15.024 ms
>>>>>>    5  144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209)  118.582 ms  116.717 ms  113.669 ms
>>>>>>    6  sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-3.sprintlink.net (144.232.3.169)  114.433 ms
>>>>>> 117.698
>>>>>> ms
>>>>>>       sl-st31-ash-0-4-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.28.6)  115.981 ms
>>>>>>    7  sl-googl10-584821-0.sprintlink.net (144.228.205.34)  123.912 ms
>>>>>> 124.402
>>>>>> ms  125.384 ms
>>>>>>    8  208.117.251.47 (208.117.251.47)  30.591 ms  30.676 ms  29.528 ms
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Derek
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/6/2013 8:31 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
>>>>>>> Can any one provide traceroutes to youtube to see if there is any
>>>>>>> correlation between last mile providers?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Grant
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Derek Ivey <derek at derekivey.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:derek at derekivey.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       I don't think it's just Time Warner. Definitely looks like XO. I
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>       Verizon FiOS and it was pretty bad for me as well (not sure if it
>>>>>>>       still is
>>>>>>>       since I'm not home right now). There's also atleast two threads
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>       Verizon FiOS section on Broadband Reports:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28027601-Horrible-youtube-speeds
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r28071070-How-to-Reddit-YouTube-firewall-rule-with-MI424wr
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       Derek
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Rick Coloccia
>>>>>>>       <coloccia at geneseo.edu <mailto:coloccia at geneseo.edu>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       > I'd like to help, too, I'm from a TWC business class site with
>>>>>>>       650 Mbps
>>>>>>>       > bandwidth and still regularly poor performance with YouTube.
>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>       > -Rick
>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>       > Sent from my iPhone 4S
>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>       > On Mar 6, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Christopher Morrow
>>>>>>>       <morrowc.lists at gmail.com <mailto:morrowc.lists at gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>       > wrote:
>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>       > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Randy Carpenter
>>>>>>>       <rcarpen at network1.net <mailto:rcarpen at network1.net>>
>>>>>>>       > wrote:
>>>>>>>       > >>
>>>>>>>       > >> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>       > >>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Randy Carpenter
>>>>>>>       > >>> <rcarpen at network1.net <mailto:rcarpen at network1.net>> wrote:
>>>>>>>       > >>>>
>>>>>>>       > >>>> We have recently been having some serious speed issues
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>       YouTube
>>>>>>>       > >>>> on our home connections, which are all Time Warner Cable.
>>>>>>>       > >>>> Some searching on forums and such revealed a work around:
>>>>>>>       > >>>>
>>>>>>>       > >>>> Block 206.111.0.0/16 <http://206.111.0.0/16> at the
>>>>>>> router.
>>>>>>>       > >>>
>>>>>>>       > >>> this was reported elsewhere... it seems odd, since that's
>>>>>>> XO
>>>>>>>       space,
>>>>>>>       > >>> not Google and not TWC space. Would you care to engage in
>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>       > >>> troubleshooting to help everyone out? :)
>>>>>>>       > >>
>>>>>>>       > >> I'll be happy to help troubleshoot in any way I can.
>>>>>>>       > >
>>>>>>>       > > excellent.. I'll arrange my ducks, let's chat offlist?
>>>>>>>       > >
>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>       >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>





More information about the NANOG mailing list