NYT covers China cyberthreat
Barry Shein
bzs at world.std.com
Thu Feb 21 01:48:19 UTC 2013
Failure to understand reality is not reality's fault.
On February 20, 2013 at 09:10 calin.chiorean at secdisk.net (calin.chiorean) wrote:
>
> If I didn't miss any part of the report, no *nix is mentioned.
>
> I'm a *nix fan, but why they (when I say they, I mean an attacker, not necessary the one in this document) should complicate their life, when all tools are available for windows os, you just have to compile them.
>
> Cheers,
> Calin
>
>
> ---- On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:02:35 +0100 Scott Weeks wrote ----
>
> >
> >
> >
> >Be sure to read the source:
> >
> >intelreport.mandiant.com/Mandiant_APT1_Report.pdf
> >
> >I'm only part way through, but I find it hard to believe that
> >only micro$loth computers are used as the attack OS. Maybe I
> >haven't gotten far enough through report to find the part
> >where they use the *nix boxes?
> >
> >scott
> >
> >
>
--
-Barry Shein
The World | bzs at TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*
More information about the NANOG
mailing list