TelePacific a good choice?

Wed Feb 20 18:16:26 UTC 2013

We have a customer who used them for IP transit at an office in San
Francisco. They seemed to have issues with International peering. Traffic
to Asia / Australia seemed to be bottlenecked. This was a year ago and the
bottleneck was between TelePacific and Global Crossing at the time.

The customer has moved to another provider and no longer has issues.

~Jared

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Mike Hale <eyeronic.design at gmail.com>wrote:

> I've used them at a previous employer, mainly for PRI termination but
> also for some transit and colo services.
>
> They were decent.  Didn't have any major complaints.
>
> If IPv6 is important for you...per what Paul said, they probably
> wouldn't be your best choice.  If IPv6 doesn't matter to you, they're
> good enough.
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Paul WALL <pauldotwall at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The lack of IPv6 implementation:
> >
> > http://bgp.he.net/AS14265#_asinfo
> >
> > should be the only feedback you need.
> >
> > On 2/19/13, Jeff Harper <jharper at well.com> wrote:
> >> Hiya,
> >>
> >> We're looking at TelePacific as a possible solution for some of our
> transit
> >> needs.  If you have an honest experience with them, positive or
> negative,
> >> I'd like to hear from you.
> >>
> >> Simply email me off line with your experiences, thanks!
> >>
> >> Jeff Harper, CCIE (W) |  www.well.com
> >> ip access-list extended jeff
> >> permit tcp any any eq intelligence
> >> deny tcp any any eq stupid-people
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
>
>