Muni fiber: L1 or L2?

Warren Bailey wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com
Thu Feb 14 01:44:07 UTC 2013


Game. Blouses.


>From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.



-------- Original message --------
From: Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org>
Date: 02/13/2013 5:25 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?



In message <511C3A4A.7050401 at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, Masataka Ohta writes:
> Edward Dore wrote:
>
> > Sadly, despite this being challenged with both the telecoms
> > regulator (Ofcom) and advertising watchdog (ASA), for some
> > reason both seem pretty happy with the utter farce that is
> > advertising BT/OpenReach's VDSL based Fibre To The Cabinet
> > and Virgin Media's Hybrid Fibre Coax networks as "fibre
> > optic broadband".
>
> Sadly, it is impossible to say FTTC not "fiber optic broadband",
> because it is "broadband" (at least with today's access speed)
> with "fiber optic".

And by that argument pots dialup is fiber optic because the packets
went over a fiber optic link to get to the CO.

Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org





More information about the NANOG mailing list