Will wholesale-only muni actually bring the boys to your yard?

Robert E. Seastrom rs at seastrom.com
Wed Feb 6 15:30:53 UTC 2013


If you were talking about layer 2 handoffs, your statement is perhaps
even more untrue - active ethernet and PON layer 2 handoffs are
approximately as easy as each other.

-r

PS: The word is _conflating_, not _confounding_.

Scott Helms <khelms at zcorum.com> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Robert E. Seastrom <[[rs at seastrom.com]]>
> wrote:
>
>                Scott Helms <[[khelms at zcorum.com]]> writes:
>      
>      > In that case its even harder.  Before you even consider doing open
>      > access talk to your FTTx vendor and find out how many they have
>      done
>      > using the same architecture you're planning on deploying.  Open
>      access
>      > in an active Ethernet install is actually fairly straight forward
>      but
>      > on a PON system its harder than a DOCSIS network.
>      
>      Categorically untrue.  It is all a matter of where the splitters are
>      placed.
>      
>
>
>
>
> You're confounding the layers of the network or perhaps I was being unclear
> that I was talking about Layer 2 handoffs.
>
>
>
>                A home run fiber plant architecture with an enormous patch
>      frame and
>      splitters provided by the open access provider if PON is their
>      technoogy of choice is indistinguishable from an active ethernet
>      install from an open access perspective.
>      
>
>
>
>
> Again, I was speaking about Layer 2 open access.
>
>
>
>                -r
>      
>      
>      
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Scott Helms
> Vice President of Technology
> ZCorum
> (678) 507-5000
> --------------------------------
> [[http://twitter.com/kscotthelms]]
> -------------------------------- 




More information about the NANOG mailing list