Is Google Fiber a model for Municipal Networks?

Frank Bulk frnkblk at iname.com
Mon Feb 4 03:53:50 UTC 2013


Sure, Verizon has been able to get their cost per home passed down to $700
(http://www.isuppli.com/Home-and-Consumer-Electronics/MarketWatch/Pages/Veri
zons-FTTH-Expansion-Stoppage-Takes-Many-by-Surprise.aspx), but that does not
include the drop, ONT, nor any home wiring to get from the ONT to the CPE
within the home.  That's still another $650 or so (slide 11 of
http://www.natoa.org/events/NATOAPresentationCalix.pdf and
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/19/technology/19fios.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
).  That's down from $1,021 in 2005 and $850 at the end of 2006
(http://connectedplanetonline.com/home/news/verizon_touts_fios_092706/).  

While my $DAYJOB's access vendor has a range of outdoor ONTs with different
features, they generally cost from $400 to $700 apiece (plus ONT housing,
power supply, battery, and power cable).  If we assume Verizon, because of
their purchasing power, can negotiate a fantastic discount, their average
ONT cost probably still exceeds $200 apiece.  Google is not concerned with
traditional POTS in their offering, so they don't have to worry about backup
power requirements (and costs), plus they're doing ActiveE, not GPON, so
despite their low volume, Google probably has ONT costs somewhat similar or
less than Verizon.

Real-world FTTH complete overbuilds among RLECs (rural incumbent LECs) are
typically between $2,000 and $5,000 per home served (that includes the ONT
and customer turn-up).  Slide 13 of
http://www.natoa.org/events/NATOAPresentationCalix.pdf shows an average of
$2,377 per home passed (100% take rate).  You can see on Slide 14 how the
lower households per square mile leads to substantially greater costs.  

Looking again at the Verizon FiOS build, where there may be a complete
overbuild but not every copper customer is converted to FiOS, the cost per
home passed does not equal cost per home served.  Note this BusinessWeek
quote regarding FiOS, "He estimates the project will end up having cost
Verizon $4,000 per connected home."
(http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_13/b4221046109606.htm)
And for Verizon's cost per home passed: "Consider the total project cost of
Verizon's FiOS, $23B, and then divide that not by the 17M homes passed (as I
did), but with the actual subscribers (5,1M), This would result in a cost
per subscriber of $23B/5.1M = $4,500."
(http://seekingalpha.com/article/778871-challenges-and-opportunities-for-goo
gle-s-fiber-project-a-reality-and-sanity-check).  From the same Seeking
Alpha article, FiOS' cumulative historical cost per home passed is $1,352.  

Remember that Google cherry-picked which city it would serve, so it was able
to identify location that is likely less challenging and expensive to serve
than the average.  A lot of Google's Kansas City build will not be buried
but hung on power poles, and they're starting their builds in areas of the
city where there was a significant level of customer interest.  All of that
is going to translate into a lower cost per customer served than a service
provider who decides to overbuild an entire locale, regardless of customer
interest.  So while Google may be able to pull off a $1,400 expenditure per
home passed, Jay can't use that price point in his own calculation unless
he's in similar construction environment and takes Google's selective
deployment approach.

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bicknell at ufp.org] 
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 4:40 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: Is Google Fiber a model for Municipal Networks?

In a message written on Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 05:03:52PM -0500, Jay Ashworth
wrote:
> > From: "Leo Bicknell" <bicknell at ufp.org>
> > Looks like $500-$700 in capex per residence is the current gold
> > standard. Note that the major factor is the take rate; if there are
> > two providers doing FTTH they are both going to max at about a 50% take
> > rate. By having one provider, a 70-80% take rate can be driven.
> 
> I was seeing 700 to drop, and another 650 to hook up; is that 5-700
supposed
> to include an ONT?

I believe the $500-$700 would include an ONT, if required, but
nothing beyond that.  "Hook up" would include installing a home
gateway, testing, setting up WiFi, installing TV boxes, etc.

So in the model I advocate, the muni-network would have $500-$700/home
to get fiber into the prem, and the L3-L7 service provider would
truck roll a guy and supply the equipment that comprise another
$500-$700 to turn up the customer.

In Google Fiber's model they are both, so it's probably $1000-$1400
a home inclusive.  $1400 @4% for 10 years is $14.17 a month per
house passed.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/





More information about the NANOG mailing list