AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO
Scott Weeks
surfer at mauigateway.com
Tue Dec 3 01:41:55 UTC 2013
--- owen at delong.com wrote:
From: Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com>
I actually tend to doubt it. All of the people I've talked to from the major
operators have said that the charges in IPv4 were not a revenue source, they
were an effort to discourage the consumption of the addresses and/or the use
of static addresses and to try and recover the costs of dealing with them in
cases where customers were willing to pay.
------------------------------------------
Not jumping into the turd chunkin' contest, but this is not my experience.
The suits definitely want the money for income stream; small as it may be.
I'd like to hear from others if their experiences are different.
scott
More information about the NANOG
mailing list