questions regarding prefix hijacking

Wed Aug 7 19:58:26 UTC 2013

On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 03:07:04 -0700, Paul Ferguson said:

> Having said that, there are quite a few documented cases of it being
> done intentionally, and for nefarious purposes.

Do I need ECC on my brain to stop the bitrot, or was there a kerfluffle a
long ways back when somebody announced 127/8, and a surprising number of
systems actually bit?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130807/a11b6e01/attachment.sig>