Big Temporary Networks

Sun Sep 16 18:26:05 UTC 2012

On 14/09/2012 12:38, Paul Thornton wrote:
> Veering slightly off-topic for NANOG, but is this worth taking onto the
> address policy mailing list ahead of RIPE65 to ensure people who aren't in
> the WG session are aware of the issue - and can therefore support (or
> question) any proposed changes?

I just posted to ap-wg about this:

> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2012-September/007183.html

Nick