The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)

Thu Sep 6 19:27:51 UTC 2012

On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:14:58 -0400, Andrew Sullivan said:

> Despite my scepticism of the overall project, I find the above claim a
> little hard to accept.  RFC 2052, which defined SRV in an
> experiment, came out in 1996.  SRV was moved to the standards track in
> 2000.  I've never heard an argument why it won't work, and we know
> that SRV records are sometimes in use.  Why couldn't that mechanism be
> used more widely?

My PS3 may want to talk to the world, but I have no control over Comcast's DNS.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20120906/f9facea2/attachment.sig>