Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?

• Previous message (by thread): Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
• Next message (by thread): Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Randy Carpenter <rcarpen at network1.net> wrote:
> How many sites do you have? If less than 192, /44 is
> perfect, unless some of those sites require more than
> a /48. Then, it gets more complicated :-)

We're having a general math breakdown today. First Jeroen wants to fit
5 /48's in a /47 and now you want to fit 192 /48's in a /44.

48-44=4. 2^4=16.

-Bill




-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004

• Previous message (by thread): Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
• Next message (by thread): Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]