Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?

• Previous message (by thread): Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
• Next message (by thread): Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

----- Original Message -----
> 
> 
> On Oct 11, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> 
> 
> so there really is no drawback from getting the /44, and having
> enough space to not have to worry about it in the future.
> 
> 
> It's only a worry if you can only route /48s, which was my question.
> And seriously, we're going to be banging around in the emptiness as
> compared to our IPv4 allocations. :)

You can route /48 or shorter (larger)

How many sites do you have? If less than 192, /44 is perfect, unless some of those sites require more than a /48. Then, it gets more complicated :-)

-Randy

• Previous message (by thread): Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
• Next message (by thread): Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]