ISPs and full packet inspection

-Hammer- bhmccie at gmail.com
Thu May 24 13:23:15 UTC 2012


And if your legal can't figure it out that is exactly what "outside 
counsel" is for.

-Hammer-

"I was a normal American nerd"
-Jack Herer



On 5/24/2012 8:22 AM, -Hammer- wrote:
> The problem is that it is strictly a jurisdictional question. I'm not 
> trying to throw it back at you. But I can't advise you w/o knowing the 
> specifics of your ISP which I don't want to know. Does that make 
> sense? What country? State? Where's your customer base? Do you have 
> multiple carriers? Do you service DOD? Outside of US? Do you service 
> EU? SWIFT (Financial wires?) etc? Mainly consumer? Commercial? The 
> list could go on.
>
> If you are being prodded by legal on this question then my advice 
> would be to tell them that they have to provide that direction.
>
> If you are being prodded by technology my advice would be to direct 
> them to legal.
>
> You should be picking up a pattern here....
> -Hammer-
>
> "I was a normal American nerd"
> -Jack Herer
>
>
> On 5/24/2012 8:13 AM, not common wrote:
>> Thanks guys, I am looking for stuff to bring to my legal team (which 
>> is one guy, that can't spell IP) and VPs.
>>
>> There has to be some thing out there or is this really a hands of topic?
>>
>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:58 AM, -Hammer- <bhmccie at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:bhmccie at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     You should be discussing this with inside counsel. Not NANOG.
>>
>>     -Hammer-
>>
>>     "I was a normal American nerd"
>>     -Jack Herer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     On 5/24/2012 7:50 AM, not common wrote:
>>
>>         Hello,
>>
>>         I am looking for some guidance on full packet inspection at
>>         the ISP level.
>>
>>         Is there any regulations that prohibit or provide guidance on
>>         this?
>>         .
>>
>>
>>



More information about the NANOG mailing list