did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?
eric at roxanne.org
Thu Mar 8 07:02:48 CST 2012
On Mar 7, 2012, at 7:37 PM, Michael Sinatra <michael at rancid.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> On 03/07/12 16:10, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> On Mar 7, 2012, at 19:06 , Jim Cowie wrote:
>>> As a meta-comment: this "Quick Look" style of blog is an experiment we're trying, based on feedback that the community wanted to hear about more of these little events as they happen. In a Quick Look, we're giving the facts as they are known from initial measurement, and a very quick summary of our preliminary analysis of the incident. Then we throw the topic open to comments from those who might have the clues to the rest of the story ...
>> Well, this member of the community appreciates it.
> I find the combination of facts and inferences presented to be interesting and useful.
More information about the NANOG