did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?

Greg Chalmers gchalmers at gmail.com
Wed Mar 7 16:55:29 CST 2012


On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Jim Cowie <cowie at renesys.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:23 AM, John van Oppen <jvanoppen at spectrumnet.us
> >wrote:
>
> > All -
> >
> > I was noticing that it appears from our Seattle-based full route feed
> from
> > cogent that they may have de-peered AS4134 (or vise-versa)...   anyone
> know
> > anything about this?    We noticed this recently in a shift of traffic
> away
> > from cogent for traffic to and from china telecom...   Now cogent's path
> is
> > _174_1239_4134_.
> >
> >
> Indeed:
> http://www.renesys.com/blog/2012/03/cogent-depeers-china-telecom.shtml
>
> cheers,   --jim
>


Isn't this journalism a bit yellow? No facts / based on speculation..

- Greg


More information about the NANOG mailing list