did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?
gchalmers at gmail.com
Wed Mar 7 16:55:29 CST 2012
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Jim Cowie <cowie at renesys.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:23 AM, John van Oppen <jvanoppen at spectrumnet.us
> > All -
> > I was noticing that it appears from our Seattle-based full route feed
> > cogent that they may have de-peered AS4134 (or vise-versa)... anyone
> > anything about this? We noticed this recently in a shift of traffic
> > from cogent for traffic to and from china telecom... Now cogent's path
> > _174_1239_4134_.
> cheers, --jim
Isn't this journalism a bit yellow? No facts / based on speculation..
More information about the NANOG