SIXSS not working?

Hank Nussbacher hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Thu Jun 21 01:23:38 CDT 2012


At 19:25 20/06/2012 -0400, Kyle Creyts wrote:

Until such time that Sixxs responds as to what happened, it will all be 
conjecture.

-Hank

>http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2012-1820 possibly 
>related?
>
>On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Jeroen Massar <jeroen at unfix.org> wrote:
> > Good morning (at least on this side of the planet),
> >
> > On 2012-06-20 02:14, Hank Nussbacher wrote:> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Jeroen
> > Massar wrote:
> >>
> >> Ill report it to them but:
> >
> > NANOG is afaik still not the "contact the people who run things" email
> > address...
> >
> > Nevertheless, if issues, do not hesitate to report to info at sixxs.net
> >
> >> http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/tla/
> >> Shows every country as V=0 (prefixes visible per country).
> >
> > That would mean that every prefix was not updated in the last day,
> > sounds odd to me.
> >
> > On 2012-06-20 04:00, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> >> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> >>
> >> It would appear that whatever was broken is now fixed.
> >
> > The only thing I can think of is that you have noticed some weird glitch
> > of the kind there.
> >
> > As mentioned above the "Visible" is basically the amount of prefixes
> > visible in the last 24 hours. For that to become 0 it would have meant
> > that no prefix would have been seen for the last 24 hours.
> >
> > According to http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/status/ which just telnets
> > into grh.sixxs.net and asks for quagga's status, seems that even peering
> > sessions are connected for longer than that, thus I am puzzled to what
> > could have caused that then.
> >
> > Greets,
> >  Jeroen
> >
> >
>
>
>
>--
>Kyle Creyts
>
>Information Assurance Professional
>BSidesDetroit Organizer




More information about the NANOG mailing list