Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD
Andrew Sullivan
asullivan at dyn.com
Mon Jun 4 19:28:10 UTC 2012
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:49:37PM -0400, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>
> one of the rationalizations for imposing a dnssec mandatory to
> implement requirement (by icann staff driven by dnssec evangelists) is
Well, I note that at least the .secure promoters haven't decided it's
a good idea:
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3-P3 <<>> @NS15.IXWEBHOSTING.COM -t DNSKEY dot-secure.co +dnssec +norec +noall +comment
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 27872
;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
Best,
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
Dyn Labs
asullivan at dyn.com
More information about the NANOG
mailing list