using "reserved" IPv6 space

Sat Jul 14 20:22:42 UTC 2012

<bashes head against wall>

Thank you all. It's not the protocol that hurts. It's rethinking the
culture/philosophy around it.

-Hammer-

On 7/14/12 3:20 PM, "Owen DeLong" <owen at delong.com> wrote:

>They're a bad thing in IPv6.
>
>The only place for security through obscurity IMHO is a small round
>container that sits next to my desk.
>
>Besides, if you don't advertise it, a GUA prefix is just as obscure as a
>ULA prefix and provides a larger search space in which one has to hunt
>for it... Think /3 instead of /8.
>
>Owen
>
>On Jul 14, 2012, at 1:14 PM, -Hammer- wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>    The whole purpose of this is that they do NOT need to be global.
>> Security thru obscurity. It actually has a place in some worlds. Does
>>that
>> make sense? Or are such V4-centric approaches a bad thing in v6?
>> 
>> On 7/13/12 8:41 PM, "Brandon Ross" <bross at pobox.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 13, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> keep life simple.  use global ipv6 space.
>>>>> 
>>>>> randy
>>>> 
>>>> Though it is rare, this is one time when I absolutely agree with
>>>>Randy.
>>> 
>>> It's even more rare for me to agree with Randy AND Owen at the same
>>>time.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Brandon Ross                                      Yahoo & AIM:
>>> BrandonNRoss
>>> +1-404-635-6667                                                ICQ:
>>> 2269442
>>> Schedule a meeting:  https://tungle.me/bross             Skype:
>>> brandonross
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>