10G switchrecommendaton
Rodrick Brown
rodrick.brown at gmail.com
Mon Jan 30 12:00:15 UTC 2012
On Jan 29, 2012, at 5:27 PM, Joe Provo <nanog-post at rsuc.gweep.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 08:02:28PM -0200, Alvaro Pereira wrote:
>> And note that the Juniper EX2500 does not run JUNOS, it is just an OEM box
>> from someone else...
>
> Blade Networks, now IBM.
If I remember correctly I believe Blade Networks licenses the same fulcrum ASIC's as the Arista's.
>>
>> Alvaro
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:23, Tim Vollebregt <tim at interworx.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> 2,5MB shared approximately.
>>>
>>> Aggregating 10G with microbursts is definately a no-go on such box.
>>>
>>> -Tim
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27-01-12 12:33, James Braunegg wrote:
>>>
>>>> How small is the buffer on the EX4500 ??
>>>>
>>>> Kindest Regards
>>>>
>>>> James Braunegg
>>>> W: 1300 769 972 | M: 0488 997 207 | D: (03) 9751 7616
>>>> E: james.braunegg at micron21.com | ABN: 12 109 977 666
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain
>>>> privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended
>>>> recipient of this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose it
>>>> to anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this message in
>>>> error please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then
>>>> delete the message from your computer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Tim Vollebregt [mailto:tim at interworx.nl]
>>>> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 8:35 PM
>>>> To: nanog at nanog.org
>>>> Subject: Re: 10G switchrecommendaton
>>>>
>>>> I would not recommend EX4500 as an 10G aggregator switch, it has really
>>>> small buffers.
>>>>
>>>> EX3300 as TOR
>>>> EX82** as 10G aggregator
>>>>
>>>> -Tim
>>>>
>>>> On 26-01-12 22:13, Raul Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Juniper EX4500.
>>>>>
>>>>> -RR
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/26/12, Deric Kwok<deric.kwok2000 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton Ipref software can test
>>>>>> around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G in single port!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>
> --
> RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE / NewNOG
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list