10G switchrecommendaton

Fri Jan 27 14:42:04 UTC 2012

Partially agree, Extreme has a "quit" good TCL implementation, and you can develop a lot of things around that. The system is able to reconfigure itself without external management console (SNMP)

Fabien

Le 27 janv. 2012 à 14:53, Drew Weaver a écrit :

> I would like to point out that in my experience if you do a lot of coding/devops/automation work with SNMP extreme is a lot harder to work with than Cisco and some of their OIDs/MIBs produce unusual results.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Drew
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grant Ridder [mailto:shortdudey123 at gmail.com] 
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 3:54 AM
> To: Erik Bais
> Cc: nanog list
> Subject: Re: 10G switchrecommendaton
> 
> I have experience with the Extreme's Alpine, Blackdiamond, x250, and x450 and i discovered that the command line is fairly different than Cisco, HP, or Dell.  However, since they are a relatively small company with a small but strong customer base, their support is fairly good.  I can't speak for 10G/40G implementations, but from my experiences, they support has a quick response time and they do quite a bit of lab replication to figure out the exact root cause.
> 
> -Grant
> 
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Erik Bais <ebais at a2b-internet.com> wrote:
> 
>> We have a full purple network, so my answer for this would be Extreme 
>> Networks.
>> 
>> Check out the Lipis report on the X670 / x670v 48 port 10G 1U switches.
>> 
>> vs other vendor equipment :
>> 
>> http://www.extremenetworks.com/libraries/products/ExtremeX670V_Lippis%
>> 20Report_Fall.pdf
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Erik Bais
>> 
>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>> 
>> Op Jan 26, 2012 om 21:20 heeft Deric Kwok <deric.kwok2000 at gmail.com> 
>> het volgende geschreven:
>> 
>>> Hi all
>>> 
>>> I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton Ipref software can test 
>>> around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G in single port!
>>> 
>>> Thank you
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 