Whacky Weekend: Is Internet Access a Human Right?
Daniel Staal
DStaal at usa.net
Thu Jan 5 21:43:51 UTC 2012
On Thu, January 5, 2012 11:37 am, Zaid Ali wrote:
>
> If I wrote a blog article that criticized the government and it was
> shutdown along with my Internet access I wouldn't say that my right to the
> Internet was violated. I would say that my right to free speech was
> violated. Regardless of one way or two way communication it is
> communication.
The Internet is quickly becoming more than just a medium for speech. It
is access to services, education, markets, and tools of analysis, among
*many* others. Many of the specifics are covered under other rights, so
the question is does the whole become more than the parts, and is *that* a
right?
I'm with the 'probably not quite yet, but soon' group. I don't think it
will be long before it is impossible to participate in modern society in
any meaningful way without access to the Internet.
Vint does have one other point: the tool is not the whole of the thing.
What we currently call 'the Internet' could be replaced by a different
network, if someone were to invent something that was a good enough
replacement. But at this point, I think *that* network would be called
'the Internet' then, and we don't *have* a separate name for the tool from
what it does. (With the possible exception of some terms in cyberpunk
novels...)
Daniel T. Staal
---------------------------------------------------------------
This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you
are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will
expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
local copyright law.
---------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the NANOG
mailing list