Sonicwall 3500/netflow

Blake Pfankuch blake at pfankuch.me
Tue Feb 14 16:39:07 CST 2012


I would be happy if it was Juniper or Cisco ish.  Right now it's just total crap :)

From: brandon.j.kim at live.com [mailto:brandon.j.kim at live.com] On Behalf Of Brandon Kim
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:14 AM
To: leigh.porter at ukbroadband.com; Blake Pfankuch; jay at miscreant.org; jra at baylink.com
Cc: nanog group
Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow

Never messed around with Juniper....



> From: leigh.porter at ukbroadband.com<mailto:leigh.porter at ukbroadband.com>
> To: brandon.kim at brandontek.com<mailto:brandon.kim at brandontek.com>; blake at pfankuch.me<mailto:blake at pfankuch.me>; jay at miscreant.org<mailto:jay at miscreant.org>; jra at baylink.com<mailto:jra at baylink.com>
> CC: nanog at nanog.org<mailto:nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:53:43 +0000
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brandon Kim [mailto:brandon.kim at brandontek.com]<mailto:[mailto:brandon.kim at brandontek.com]>
> > Sent: 14 February 2012 15:51
> > To: blake at pfankuch.me<mailto:blake at pfankuch.me>; jay at miscreant.org<mailto:jay at miscreant.org>; jra at baylink.com<mailto:jra at baylink.com>
> > Cc: nanog group
> > Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
> >
> >
> > I've been using 5.8 with no problems thus far. As for the CLI, yes it
> > is CLUNKY.
> >
> > But they are completely revamping it, it will be very similar to Cisco
> > in the near future...
>
> Why do people like to base their CLIs on the really rather awful Cisco style interface rather than something with some more structure like Juniper?
>
>
> --
> Leigh Porter
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________


More information about the NANOG mailing list