Redundant Routes, BGP with MPLS provider

Fri Aug 31 16:27:49 UTC 2012

On 8/31/12, Bill.Ingrum at t-systems.com <Bill.Ingrum at t-systems.com> wrote:
> I think having a GRE tunnel for the internal routing protocol is
> unnecessary.

It might be, but we have a requirement for multicast over the wan so
the GRE tunnels had to be there.

>  Can you explain the reasoning behind this?  I understand
> the technical issue whereby GRE will allow multicast for EIGRP, OSPF,
> etc, but why not just redistribute into BGP?

I see no reason to trust the provider that much.

> I work on a lot of MPLS CE routers, and in general you can accomplish
> anything you need by redistributing your internal routing protocol into
> BGP, and adjusting LP, MED and AS Prepend as needed.

Sure.. but how do you *know* you're not getting anything added/removed
by the provider?

Lee

>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee [mailto:ler762 at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 11:15 AM
> To: Tribble, Wesley
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Redundant Routes, BGP with MPLS provider
>
> On 8/30/12, Tribble, Wesley <WTribble at sterneagee.com> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am an Network Operator working in an Enterprise environment with
>> offices all over the country(mostly connected via MPLS).  We are
>> currently working towards building a Disaster Recovery Site that will
>> host some of our vendor routers and provide the capability to access
>> these vendors from both our primary and backup data center locations.
>
>> The routes(as advertised by the vendor's routers) will be the same at
>> both locations.  I would like to advertise the routes from multiple
>> locations at the same time, rather than suppress the routes and
> advertise conditionally.
>
> At work, we have our internal routing protocol running on GRE over IPSec
> tunnels & keep the BGP sessions with the MPLS provider limited to just
> the MPLS network.  And have an ACL on the MPLS network
> interface that allows only what's expected in...   some providers are
> better than others at not having anything hit the 'deny any any log'
> line
>
> Regards,
> Lee
>
>
>>
>> What is the best method to Instruct the provider's network to prefer
>> the Primary Data Center routes over the DR site?  Keep in mind that I
>> am only peering with the provider over BGP and I have no visibility to
>
>> the underlying MPLS architecture or configuration.  Although if you
>> have specific questions  about their architecture, I can work to get
> answers.
>>
>> Discussing in house, we have gone over a few different options:
>>
>> -Advertise specific routes from primary site and summary routes from
>> the DR site.  Most specific will always be chosen.
>> -Prepend the routes from the DR site so that they will have a longer
>> AS-path than the Primary location -Use Community Strings to influence
>> local preference.(Still working to find out if Provider will pass our
>> community strings)
>>
>> Just looking for some ideas and best practices.  Any thoughts or
>> insight would be much welcomed and appreciated.  This is my first
>> message on NANOG, so please be gentle.  I apologize in advance if I
>> have done something incorrectly.
>>
>>
>> Wes
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> **********************************************************************
>> **************************** Sterne Agee Group, Inc. and its
>> subsidiaries request that you do not transmit orders and instructions
>> regarding your Sterne Agee account by e-mail. Transactional details do
>
>> not supersede normal trade confirmations or statements. The
>> information contained in this transmission is privileged and
>> confidential. It is intended for the use of the individual or entity
>> named above. The information contained herein is based on sources we
>> believe reliable but is not considered all-inclusive. Opinions are our
>
>> current opinions only and are subject to change without notice.
>> Offerings are subject to prior sale and/or change in price. Prices,
>> quotes, rates and yields are subject to change without notice. Sterne
>> Agee & Leach, Inc. member FINRA and SIPC, is a registered
>> broker-dealer subsidiary of Sterne Agee Group, Inc. Generally,
>> investments are NOT FDIC INSURED, NOT BANK GUARANTEED, and MAY LOSE
>> VALUE. Please contact your Financial Advisor with information
>> regarding specific investments.
>> Sterne Agee
>> reserves the right to monitor all electronic correspondence.
>>
> ************************************************************************
> **************************
>>
>
>