US House to ITU: Hands off the Internet

• Previous message (by thread): US House to ITU: Hands off the Internet
• Next message (by thread): US House to ITU: Hands off the Internet
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

in my stupid opinion it is the problem of a new global still developing global market - key dominated players are from  our countries - which see on them as on strategical national strategic assets. Should I explain more?
Or it is already clear?

I classified censorship and IPR protection in the same manner or I mistaken?


On Aug 4, 2012, at 2:44 AM, Dmitry Burkov wrote:

> The real issue is not laid in their economics - but in ours - our legacy players(mobile are the same)
> We simply try to hide our own problems behind their issues and use them again  to protect our market interests
> - no more.
> 
> 
> On Aug 4, 2012, at 2:03 AM, John Curran wrote:
> 
>> On Aug 3, 2012, at 5:57 PM, Dmitry Burkov <dburk at burkov.aha.ru>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> My opinion that the real problem laid in financial issues with developing countires 
>> 
>> Dmitry - 
>> 
>> There is a very real financial issue that developing countries face 
>> with affording the infrastructure that their citizens want to use
>> (and often used to access to VoIP and streaming media services)
>> 
>> I do think that there needs to be ample discussion of these concerns,
>> but do not assume that a regulatory regime is the only available 
>> solution the issues raised.
>> 
>> FYI,
>> /John
>> 
>> John Curran
>> President and CEO
>> ARIN
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

• Previous message (by thread): US House to ITU: Hands off the Internet
• Next message (by thread): US House to ITU: Hands off the Internet
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]