IPv6 support via Charter | Ideas on BGP Tunnel via HE
Anurag Bhatia
me at anuragbhatia.com
Wed Apr 11 20:03:22 UTC 2012
Hi Seth
I just did a test from Eu based server sitting below EU based HE Tunnel
node by downloading Ubuntu release file from US based server. This does not
tells about possible high speed but surely tells what is available atleast.
Server itself is sitting on M-Online with 100Mbps pipe.
IPv4:
traceroute to mirror.anl.gov (146.137.96.7), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 gw.giga-dns.com (91.194.90.1) [AS51167] 16.876 ms 16.925 ms 16.915 ms
2 host-93-104-204-33.customer.m-online.net (93.104.204.33) [AS8767]
1.166 ms 1.449 ms 1.445 ms
3 xe-2-1-0.rt-decix-1.m-online.net (212.18.6.162) [AS8767] 8.889 ms
8.888 ms 8.880 ms
4 20gigabitethernet4-3.core1.fra1.he.net (80.81.192.172) [AS6695] 18.586
ms 19.831 ms 19.824 ms
5 10gigabitethernet1-4.core1.par2.he.net (184.105.213.162) [AS6939]
18.794 ms 18.789 ms 10gigabitethernet2-2.core1.par2.he.net (72.52.92.26)
[AS6939] 18.437 ms
6 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.par2.he.net (184.105.213.90) [AS6939]
18.507 ms 10gigabitethernet7-1.core1.ash1.he.net (184.105.213.93) [AS6939]
96.880 ms 97.345 ms
7 esnet.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net (216.66.70.18) [AS6939]
95.544 ms 10gigabitethernet7-1.core1.ash1.he.net (184.105.213.93) [AS6939]
97.616 ms esnet.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net (216.66.70.18)
[AS6939] 95.354 ms
8 washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (134.55.221.145) [AS293] 97.835 ms
esnet.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net (216.66.70.18) [AS6939] 95.727
ms washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (134.55.221.145) [AS293] 98.492 ms
9 washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (134.55.221.145) [AS293] 98.463 ms
washsdn1-sdn2-washcr1.es.net (134.55.220.54) [AS293] 110.668 ms 110.641 ms
10 starsdn1-ip-washsdn2.es.net (134.55.218.65) [AS293] 120.357 ms
120.844 ms washsdn1-sdn2-washcr1.es.net (134.55.220.54) [AS293] 110.834 ms
11 starcr1-ip-starsdn1.es.net (134.55.219.25) [AS293] 164.788 ms 164.548
ms 164.550 ms
12 starcr1-ip-starsdn1.es.net (134.55.219.25) [AS293] 164.758 ms
anlmr2-starcr1.es.net (134.55.219.53) [AS293] 128.288 ms 128.286 ms
13 guava-esnet.anchor.anl.gov (192.5.170.77) [AS683] 117.532 ms
anlmr2-starcr1.es.net (134.55.219.53) [AS293] 128.263 ms
guava-esnet.anchor.anl.gov (192.5.170.77) [AS683] 117.500 ms
14 * guava-esnet.anchor.anl.gov (192.5.170.77) [AS683] 117.687 ms
117.858 ms
15 * * *
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
root at server7:/home/anurag/tmp# wget -4
http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso
--2012-04-11 21:56:46--
http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso
Resolving mirror.anl.gov... 146.137.96.7
Connecting to mirror.anl.gov|146.137.96.7|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 1644474368 (1.5G) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso.1'
100%[============================================================================================================================>]
1,644,474,368 4.78M/s in 5m 38s
2012-04-11 22:02:25 (4.64 MB/s) - `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso.1' saved
[1644474368/1644474368]
IPv6:
traceroute to mirror.anl.gov (2620:0:dc0:1800:214:4fff:fe7d:1b9), 30 hops
max, 80 byte packets
1 2001:470:25:78f::1 (2001:470:25:78f::1) [AS6939] 18.918 ms 21.147 ms
23.357 ms
2 gige-g2-20.core1.zrh1.he.net (2001:470:0:11d::1) [AS6939] 23.341 ms
23.324 ms 23.797 ms
3 10gigabitethernet5-1.core1.fra1.he.net (2001:470:0:21c::1) [AS6939]
29.781 ms 30.252 ms 23.671 ms
4 10gigabitethernet5-3.core1.lon1.he.net (2001:470:0:1d2::1) [AS6939]
37.897 ms 37.880 ms 43.095 ms
5 10gigabitethernet7-4.core1.nyc4.he.net (2001:470:0:128::1) [AS6939]
104.552 ms 105.763 ms 105.742 ms
6 10gigabitethernet2-3.core1.ash1.he.net (2001:470:0:36::1) [AS6939]
113.963 ms 114.467 ms 111.478 ms
7
lawrence-berkeley-national-laboratory.gigabitethernet4-15.core1.ash1.he.net(2001:470:1:27f::2)
[AS6939] 109.467 ms 109.452 ms 109.435 ms
8 washcr1-te-eqxashrt1.es.net (2001:400:0:15a::1) [AS293] 115.929 ms
113.625 ms 115.896 ms
9 washsdn1-sdn2-washcr1.es.net (2001:400:0:e0::2) [AS293] 114.606 ms
112.068 ms 112.045 ms
10 starsdn1-ip-washsdn2.es.net (2001:400:0:ab::1) [AS293] 126.783 ms
130.008 ms 126.747 ms
11 starcr1-ip-starsdn1.es.net (2001:400:0:a2::2) [AS293] 127.268 ms
124.223 ms 124.125 ms
12 anlmr2-starcr1.es.net (2001:400:0:c0::1) [AS293] 128.066 ms 130.529
ms 130.513 ms
13 2001:400:2202:8::2 (2001:400:2202:8::2) [AS293] 130.976 ms 128.915 ms
128.892 ms
14 * * *
15 * * *
root at server7:/home/anurag/tmp# wget -6
http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso
--2012-04-11 21:45:52--
http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs/ubuntu/12.04/beta-2/ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso
Resolving mirror.anl.gov... 2620:0:dc0:1800:214:4fff:fe7d:1b9
Connecting to mirror.anl.gov|2620:0:dc0:1800:214:4fff:fe7d:1b9|:80...
connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 1644474368 (1.5G) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso'
100%[============================================================================================================================>]
1,644,474,368 *3.66M/s in 6m 11s*
2012-04-11 21:52:04 (4.22 MB/s) - `ubuntu-12.04-beta2-dvd-i386.iso' saved
[1644474368/1644474368]
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Seth Mos <seth.mos at dds.nl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Op 11 apr 2012, om 20:16 heeft Anurag Bhatia het volgende geschreven:
>
> > Also, does it makes sense to go for BGP Tunnel for now? I just setup IPv6
> > Tunnel via Hurricane Electric. Latency seems pretty much OK ~ 10-15ms of
> > overhead. Yet to test other parameters. I heard Tunnels are usually bad.
> > Can someone tell how to test this tunnel setup to confirm if there is a
> > performance issue or not? I am thinking of writing a quick bash script
> and
> > run via cron to test latency, packet loss and bandwidth throughput for
> > couple of days. If anyone has better idea, please let me know.
>
> Also using a HE.net BGP tunnel for our IPv6, simply because having just 1
> native provider with Ipv6 isn't redundant. That and it's 8mbit.
>
> The v4 connection which the tunnel connects over is 90mbit, and the tunnel
> needs to travel from NL to DE for the FRA BGP peering.
>
> I'm getting about 40mbit through the IPv6 tunnel, so i'd say it works
> well, although the throughput has slowly been dropping to the 30's range
> over the last 6 months. But that's probably because of the latency.
>
> For something that is provided for free I'm really glad we have it.
>
> I should have peered with their UK PoP as it's much closer by latency,
> thus faster.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Seth
>
--
Anurag Bhatia
anuragbhatia.com
or simply - http://[2001:470:26:78f::5] if you are on IPv6 connected
network!
Twitter: @anurag_bhatia <https://twitter.com/#!/anurag_bhatia>
Linkedin: http://linkedin.anuragbhatia.com
More information about the NANOG
mailing list