Colocation providers and ACL requests

Wed Oct 26 14:37:23 UTC 2011

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Keegan Holley" <keegan.holley at sungard.com>

> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Keegan Holley" <keegan.holley at sungard.com>
> >
> > > I'm assuming colo means hosting, and the OP misspoke. Most colo
> > > providers
> > > don't provide active network for colo (as in power and rack only)
> > customers.
> >
> > Most?
> 
> I'm sure there are exceptions to that rule. It's better than "YMMV".

Perhaps I look at a different category of colo provider, then, but I'm 
accustomed to seeing it be well up into double-digit percentage of the ones
I've ever looked at.

"Hosting", to me, means "provider's hardware", not just "local blended bandwidth".

Cheers,
-- jr 'so many things are just me' a
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra at baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      http://photo.imageinc.us             +1 727 647 1274