Please change Mailman back to NOT force the rewrite for Reply-to

Phil Regnauld regnauld at
Sat Oct 15 16:17:58 CDT 2011

John Peach (john-nanog) writes:
> > Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps only on 
> > Futures, but since it seems to be a recent change, I'm doing the public 
> > service of pointing it out, while asking that it be adjusted back.
> I don't see that; I have to specifically choose to reply to the list.
> Maybe someone, like me, sets their own reply-to to the list.

	From the headers.

	X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
	Precedence: list
	Reply-To: nanog at
	List-Id: North American Network Operators Group <>

	Mutt asks me, but other mailers might not.


More information about the NANOG mailing list