meeting network

Randy Carpenter rcarpen at network1.net
Mon Oct 10 12:29:13 CDT 2011


I have been at other conference that have triple or more participants, and it has never been anything close to the issues we are having at this hotel. Slightly slower performance is expected. Completely not working is not.

-Randy

----- Original Message -----
> In my historical knowledge of this: there are only so many venues
> that can have 500-650 people and fit.
> 
> Jared Mauch
> 
> On Oct 10, 2011, at 1:12 PM, "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk at iname.com> wrote:
> 
> > Then the RFP for the meeting needs to be more specific with some
> > basic SLAs
> > that result in a smaller bill if not met.
> > 
> > Frank
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy at psg.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 9:44 AM
> > To: Randy Carpenter
> > Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
> > Subject: Re: meeting network
> > 
> >> I would think that the contract with the hotel for the conference
> >> would include the specific requirements for the network. Is that
> >> not
> >> the case?
> > 
> > underlying problems
> > 
> >  o no hotel believe that we'll actually be significantly high use.
> >    they simply can not conceive of it.  ietf, apricot, ... have
> >    seen this time and time again
> > 
> >  o the hotel does not manage the network, so you have two comms
> >  hops
> >    to anyone who can do anything.  and anyway, they are not going
> >    to
> >    provision more bandwidth
> > 
> > but the problems of which i spoke were the meeting network.  which
> > we
> > do supposedly control.
> > 
> > randy
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 



More information about the NANOG mailing list