IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?

Tue Nov 29 18:11:31 UTC 2011

On 11/29/11 09:30 , Owen DeLong wrote:
> I believe those have been obsoleted, but, /64 remains the best choice, IMHO.

operational practice has moved on.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6164

> Owen
> 
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:00 AM, McCall, Gabriel wrote:
> 
>> Note that /127 is strongly discouraged in RFC5375 and RFC3627. 3627 suggests using /112 for router links, or /126 at the very most.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred at cisco.com] 
>> ...
>> I see no reason you couldn't use a /127 prefix if the link was point to point.
>> ... 
>>
> 
> 
> 