where was my white knight....

Tue Nov 8 22:32:09 UTC 2011

In a message written on Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 10:19:24PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> One solution is to have directly-connected rpki caches available to all 
> your bgp edge routers throughout your entire network.  This may turn out to 
> be expensive capex-wise, and will turn out to be yet another critical 
> infrastructure item to maintain, increasing opex.

Couldn't you just have a couple of these boxes on your network and
route them in your IGP, removing any BGP dependancy?  KISS.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20111108/94ee8381/attachment.sig>