IPv6 SEO implecations?

Franck Martin fmartin at linkedin.com
Wed Mar 30 19:22:17 CDT 2011


On 3/31/11 11:55 , "Wil Schultz" <wschultz at bsdboy.com> wrote:

>
>
>On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell at gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 29 Mar 2011 17:54:27 Wil Schultz wrote:
>>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> And here's a breakdown of which user agents are seen on which ip, as
>>>you can 
>> see the user-agent doesn't exactly match IP range.
>>> 
>>> Googlebot-Image/1.0
>> 
>>> Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1;
>>>+http://www.google.com/bot.html);
>> 
>>> DoCoMo/2.0 N905i(c100;TB;W24H16) (compatible; Googlebot-Mobile/2.1;
>> +http://www.google.com/bot.html)
>> 
>>> SAMSUNG-SGH-E250/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
>> UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.101 (GUI) MMP/2.0 (compatible;
>>Googlebot-Mobile/2.1;
>> +http://www.google.com/bot.html)
>> 
>> Interesting that there are Googlebot mobile devices! Perhaps
>>user-experience 
>> testing of some kind? Googlers? Or IPv6 testing of the devices
>>themselves? 
>> Although those user strings are indicative of not very recent,
>>non-Android 
>> phones.
>> 
>> Would be interesting to see the percentages of traffic by each user
>>agent.
>> -- 
>> The only thing worse than e-mail disclaimers...is people who send
>>e-mail to 
>> lists complaining about them
>
>I've got the logs still but I've torn down the VIP. I'll send hit count
>percentages tomorrow.

Interesting:

http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aipv6.cnn.com

http://www.bing.com/search?q=site%3Aipv6.cnn.com





More information about the NANOG mailing list