Quick comparison of LSNs and NAT64
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Thu Jun 9 19:23:33 UTC 2011
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:39:17AM -0700, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> Each solution fits well for some set of constraints and objectives
Indeed. Unfortunately there's no good way to support v6-only clients in
an environment, where dual stacked endpoints do exist as well, see
RFC6147 (DNS64) ch. 6.3.2.
We still need to find some solution to that problem.
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
More information about the NANOG
mailing list