in defense of lisp (was: Anybody can participate in the IETF)

Scott Brim scott.brim at gmail.com
Wed Jul 13 15:22:21 UTC 2011


On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:09, Fred Baker <fred at cisco.com> wrote:
> I think ILNP is a great solution. My concern with it is that the needed changes to TCP and UDP are not likely to happen.

I guess I should clarify: I think ILNP is elegant.  But the real
Internet evolves incrementally, and only as needed.  Other
trajectories are much more likely.




More information about the NANOG mailing list