Myspace contact needed

Tue Jul 12 15:50:01 UTC 2011

I use a VPN from Beijing, where I reside. It's pretty common for myspace 
to blacklist any IP addresses that they believe belong to crawlers, 
linkbots, VPN services, etc. This appears to be an automated process. 
I've never had luck getting any of my VPN IPs unblocked.

Good luck getting in touch with anyone there, the company was just sold 
to a consortium of celebrities after massive News Corp. layoffs and it's 
left with walking zombies. I'd be surprised if anyone competent is still 
left...

-TProphet

On 7/12/2011 9:49 PM, Walter Keen wrote:
>
> Sorry about the lack of details.
>
> I'm looking for a Myspace contact, We're an ISP (AS20394) and all of our
> users are getting a 302 redirect to google after contacting a myspace
> server. If there is an appropriate contact on this list, or someone who
> can forward this to such a contact, it would be greatly appreciated.
> I don't have this issue from other ISP connections(such as my home
> connection), but have not heard back from the website support portal as
> of yet.
>
>
>
>
> wkeen at tnwx-nms-3:~$ traceroute www.myspace.com
> traceroute to www.myspace.com (216.178.39.11), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> 1 tnwx-core-1.rainierconnect.com (69.10.208.1) 0.409 ms 0.479 ms 0.559 ms
> 2 74.50.203.97 (74.50.203.97) 1.772 ms 1.769 ms 1.805 ms
> 3 ge5-0-2d0.cir1.seattle7-wa.us.xo.net (216.156.100.41) 1.703 ms 1.708
> ms 1.707 ms
> 4 4.59.232.53 (4.59.232.53) 2.064 ms 2.067 ms 2.056 ms
> 5 ae-31-51.ebr1.Seattle1.Level3.net (4.69.147.150) 11.408 ms 11.374 ms
> 11.484 ms
> 6 ae-7-7.ebr2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.132.49) 19.095 ms 18.870 ms
> 18.997 ms
> 7 ae-34-34.ebr4.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.153.34) 20.638 ms 30.373 ms
> 30.333 ms
> 8 ae-5-5.ebr2.SanJose5.Level3.net (4.69.148.141) 19.631 ms 19.813 ms
> 19.803 ms
> 9 ae-6-6.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.148.201) 29.283 ms 28.981 ms
> 29.246 ms
> 10 ae-62-62.csw1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.18) 29.091 ms
> ae-72-72.csw2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.22) 29.461 ms 29.437 ms
> 11 ae-24-70.car4.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.144.70) 29.684 ms
> ae-44-90.car4.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.144.198) 29.562 ms
> ae-14-60.car4.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.144.6) 29.680 ms
> 12 ve202.lax.myspace.com (4.71.128.10) 29.351 ms 28.998 ms 29.203 ms
> 13 vl342.cs2.lax1.myspace.com (204.16.35.137) 29.431 ms 29.540 ms 29.638 ms
> 14 vl3552.cs2.els2.myspace.com (216.178.35.77) 29.970 ms 29.717 ms 29.726 ms
> 15 * * *
> 16 * * *
> 17 * * *
> 18 * * *
> 19 * * *
>
> wkeen at tnwx-nms-3:~$ wget www.myspace.com
> --2011-07-12 06:45:32-- http://www.myspace.com/
> Resolving www.myspace.com... 63.135.80.46
> Connecting to www.myspace.com|63.135.80.46|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
> Location: http://www.google.com [following]
> --2011-07-12 06:45:32-- http://www.google.com/
> Resolving www.google.com... 72.14.213.106, 72.14.213.147, 72.14.213.99, ...
> Connecting to www.google.com|72.14.213.106|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: unspecified [text/html]
> Saving to: `index.html.5'
>
> [ <=> ] 9,908 --.-K/s in 0.009s
>
> 2011-07-12 06:45:32 (1.01 MB/s) - `index.html.5' saved [9908]
>
> wkeen at tnwx-nms-3:~$
>
>
>
> <walter.keen at rainierconnect.net> wrote:
>  > My apologies all, I meant to say myspace contact
>  >
>
> You're more likely to get a response if you give some indication
> of what the issue is; for example, saying "I'm looking for a MySpace
> contact because there is an attack coming from their servers that
> appears to indicate they may have been compromised" will likely
> get you a faster reaction from the security people. Or, if it's a
> network issue, saying "I'm looking for a MySpace network contact
> because it appears they are announcing the following blocks which
> really belong to me, which is causing reachability issues" will more
> likely get you a reaction from an appropriate network person.
>
> Without an indication of the nature of the problem, I think you'll find
> most people on the list tend to ignore generic requests like this.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matt
>