Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?

Wed Jan 12 19:08:30 UTC 2011

On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Jack Bates wrote:

> 
> 
> On 1/12/2011 11:01 AM, George Bonser wrote:
>> NAT66 is just
>> straight static NAT that maps one prefix to a different prefix.
>> 
> 
> I'd eat a hat if a vendor didn't implement a PAT equivalent. It's demanded too much. There is money for it, so it will be there.
> 
> 
> Jack

Fortunately, so far, it isn't. Hopefully we can cure the demand through education instead of acquiescence and profiteering.

Owen