ARIN and IPv6 Requests

Joel Jaeggli joelja at bogus.com
Thu Feb 24 06:20:06 UTC 2011


On 2/23/11 10:10 PM, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> (Yeah, high reply latency...)
> 
> Is Carrier V still filtering at sub-/32 on their IPv6 peerings? Last I was in a position to check, not even Apple's /45 was visible from inside AS701.

evidence says that they are now accepting longer prefixes.

> -C
> 
> On Feb 10, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Eric Clark wrote:
> 
>> Don't remember about the v4 part, but 3 years ago they issued me a /48, specifically for my first site and indicated that a block was reserved for additional sites. I can probably dig that up.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Feb 10, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Jason Iannone <jason.iannone at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It also looks like there isn't a policy for orgs with multiple
>>> multihomed sites to get a /48 per site.  Is there an exception policy
>>> somewhere?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:50 PM,  <ADWebb at dstsystems.com> wrote:
>>>> Initial. Documenting IPv4 usage is in the request template.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Adam Webb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From:
>>>> "Nick Olsen" <nick at flhsi.com>
>>>> To:
>>>> <nanog at nanog.org>
>>>> Date:
>>>> 02/10/2011 01:45 PM
>>>> Subject:
>>>> re: ARIN and IPv6 Requests
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We requested our initial allocation without any such questions. Is this
>>>> your initial or additional?
>>>>
>>>> Nick Olsen
>>>> Network Operations
>>>> (855) FLSPEED  x106
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> From: ADWebb at dstsystems.com
>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 2:38 PM
>>>> To: nanog at nanog.org
>>>> Subject: ARIN and IPv6 Requests
>>>>
>>>> Why does ARIN require detailed usage of IPv4 space when requesting IPv6
>>>> space? Seems completely irrelevant to me.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Adam Webb
>>>> EN & ES Team
>>>> desk: 816.737.9717
>>>> cell: 916.949.1345
>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>> The biggest secret of innovation is that anyone can do it.
>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> -----------------------------------------
>>>> Please consider the environment before printing this email and any
>>>> attachments.
>>>>
>>>> This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for the
>>>> individual or company to which it is addressed and may contain
>>>> information which is privileged, confidential and prohibited from
>>>> disclosure or unauthorized use under applicable law.  If you are
>>>> not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified
>>>> that any use, dissemination, or copying of this e-mail or the
>>>> information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited by the
>>>> sender.  If you have received this transmission in error, please
>>>> return the material received to the sender and delete all copies
>>>> from your system.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> 





More information about the NANOG mailing list